Flowers for Algernon and The Garden of Eden Essay

Daniel Keyes’s anecdotal story, â€Å"Flowers for Algernon†, drew on topics, examples of occasions, and character types from the Biblical story of the Garden of Eden. The two stories had a common subject: Ignorance is happiness. The two stories additionally shared a comparable example of occasions. Charlie Gordon, the hero in â€Å"Flowers for Algernon†, and Adam and Eve, the primary characters in the Garden of Eden, all began in a condition of guiltlessness, uninformed of malevolence, until they were urged to get more intelligent. After they had picked up insight, their eyes were opened to the entirety of the disagreeableness on the planet, and they endured the results. There were additionally similitudes in the characters in the two stories, for example, between the Serpent and Miss Kinnian and among Eve and Algernon. Daniel Keyes rendered the material new by changing the setting, the characters, and the occasions of the story to something substantially more pr esent day. In â€Å"Flowers for Algernon†, Charlie needed to get brilliant, however once he did, he understood that individuals used to ridicule him, and the vast majority quit conversing with him as regularly as they used to, either on the grounds that they were terrified of him or couldn’t get him. Algernon kicked the bucket, and Charlie lost the entirety of his knowledge. In the Garden of Eden, God cautioned Adam and Eve not to eat from the tree of the information on great and insidiousness, however they didn’t tune in. The snake persuaded Eve to eat the taboo natural product, and afterward Eve persuaded Adam to eat it also. At the point when they ate the natural product, they picked up information and insight, got mindful of evilness, and acknowledged they were stripped. God sentenced them to an existence of misery and in the long run demise. The normal subject of these two stories is obliviousness is happiness. Now and again it’s preferable to know nothing over something. The example of occasions in â€Å"Flowers for Algernon† reflect those of the Garden of Eden. In the Garden of Eden, God made Adam and Eve. They were totally honest and unadulterated, however not great. God cautioned them not to eat from the tree of the information on great and shrewdness. The underhanded snake persuaded Eve to eat the taboo natural product at any rate. At the point when Adam and Eve ate from the tree of information, their eyes were opened, and they picked up information and insight, yet they were additionally presented to malice, and they felt stripped. Their condition of blamelessness was lost. At the point when God got some answers concerning this, He rebuffed Adam and Eve. In â€Å"Flowers for Algernon†, Charlie Gordon had an inability and needed insight. Miss Kinnian convinced Charlie to proceed with the activity. He consented to experience the medical procedure that the specialists thought would significantly increase his knowledge, despite the fact that he knew about the dangers in question. The activity made Charlie unimaginably keen, however it likewise made him mindful that individuals ridiculed him. At a certain point, Charlie expressed that he felt as though he was stripped. His insight in the long run break down, and Algernon passes on. In the two stories, the primary characters start off in a condition of obliviousness, are convinced to build their insight, choose to pick up information, in spite of realizing the dangers in question, and afterward they need to pay dearly. A portion of the characters in â€Å"Flowers for Algernon† and the Garden of Eden are fundamentally the same as. For instance, Charlie, Adam, and Eve are comparative since they are the primary characters, they began in a condition of obliviousness, and they all got information. Also, the snake and Miss Kinnian are similar in light of the fact that the two of them convinced the fundamental characters to get more astute. In conclusion, Eve and Algernon were both the main characters to secure information. Daniel Keyes rendered the material new by changing the setting, the characters, and the occasions. The Garden of Eden occurred at the outset, while â€Å"Flowers for Algernon† occurred in the twentieth century. Rather than a talking snake urging someone to eat enchanted natural product, Daniel Keyes utilized Miss Kinnian to convince Charlie to do the activity. Thirdly, in the Garden of Eden, the taboo natural product offered information to Adam and Eve, yet in Flowers for Algernon, an activity caused Charlie to turn out to be increasingly canny. Topics, examples of occasions, and character types found in Flowers for Algernon reflect those found in the Biblical story of the Garden of Eden. The tales both offer a similar subject: Ignorance is happiness. The two of them have comparative examples of occasions: The principle characters begin in a condition of guiltlessness and obliviousness, at that point they are convinced to expand their insight. The primary characters concurred, notwithstanding the dangers in question. The primary characters needed to confront the outcomes of accepting information. Adam, Eve, and Charlie, the snake and Miss Kinnian, and Eve and Algernon all mirror one another. Daniel Keyes modernized the Biblical story of the Garden of Eden by evolving theâ setting, the characters, and the occasions, in spite of the fact that the general topic, examples of occasions, and kinds of characters are comparable in the two stories.